Skip to main content
Comparison

SEOLint
vs Sitebulb

Sitebulb: Beautiful site audit visualisations with detailed crawl reports. Great UX for understanding site structure.

Try a free scanSee pricing

TL;DR

SEOLint is a focused single-page SEO auditor with an MCP server for Claude, LLM-ready fix prompts, a REST API, and a $79/month flat price. Sitebulb is beautiful site audit visualisations with detailed crawl reports. great ux for understanding site structure. The right pick depends on whether you want the broader suite or an audit that fits inside a developer workflow.

Sitebulb is the SEO tool that finally made site crawls readable. The visualisations are genuinely good, and for an agency running audits on ten client sites a week it pays for itself. SEOLint is built for a smaller problem: a single developer who wants to catch SEO regressions the same way they catch type errors, without installing anything or leaving their editor.

Side-by-side comparison

The features that matter when you are picking a tool for developer-led SEO.

Feature
SEOLint
Sitebulb
Single-page SEO audit
Full site crawl (hundreds of pages)
—
MCP server for Claude
—
AI-generated fix prompts
—
REST API
—
Backlink analysis
—
—
Rank tracking
—
—
No install required
—
Results in under 60 seconds
—
Free tier available
—
Starting price
$79/month
£99/month

Why founders and developers choose us

What you get with SEOLint that Sitebulb does not cover.

  • MCP server: ask Claude to scan your site from any conversation
  • LLM-ready fix prompt for every issue, paste into Claude or Cursor
  • No install, runs in the browser or terminal
  • $79/month, built for solo developers

Where Sitebulb is different

Honest trade-offs. These are reasons you might still prefer Sitebulb.

  • Desktop app: Mac and Windows only, no browser or CLI
  • £99/month, built for agencies with larger budgets
  • No AI-generated fix instructions
  • No MCP server or API for automation

Which one should you pick?

Pick Sitebulb if you are an agency presenting audits to non-technical stakeholders and need the visuals to carry the story. Pick SEOLint if you would rather skip the PDF export and pipe issues straight into Claude Code.

Common questions

Is SEOLint better than Sitebulb?
It depends on your needs. SEOLint is built for founders and developers who use Claude. Connect it as an MCP server in 2 minutes and Claude can scan any URL natively. Every issue comes with a LLM-ready fix prompt that Claude can execute directly on your codebase. Sitebulb is better if you need a full SEO suite or site-wide crawling. If you want AI-native output and developer ergonomics, SEOLint is the focused choice.
Does SEOLint work as an MCP server for Claude?
Yes. Add one config block to Claude Desktop or Claude Code and Claude gains access to scan_website(), get_scan(), and list_scans() as native tools. You can ask Claude "scan my homepage and fix the critical issues" and it handles the full loop, no browser tab needed. Sitebulb has no MCP integration.
How much does SEOLint cost compared to Sitebulb?
SEOLint is $79/month, one flat price per site under agent watch. Includes weekly auto-scans, 200 AI credits/month bundled in (BYOK to skip the cap), MCP server, CLI, AI fix prompts, REST API, GitHub Actions, and the PR bot. No annual commitment, cancel anytime. Multi-site Custom plan available via email.

Related reading

Connect to Claude in 2 minutes.

$79/month. MCP server included. Cancel anytime.

Try a free scan