Skip to main content
Comparison

SEOLint
vs Sitechecker

Sitechecker: Solid all-in-one SEO checker with site monitoring, rank tracking, and scheduled audits.

TL;DR

SEOLint is a focused single-page SEO auditor with an MCP server for Claude, LLM-ready fix prompts, a REST API, and a $79/month flat price. Sitechecker is solid all-in-one seo checker with site monitoring, rank tracking, and scheduled audits. The right pick depends on whether you want the broader suite or an audit that fits inside a developer workflow.

Sitechecker is a general-purpose SEO tool covering audits, rank tracking, and monitoring. It is aimed at marketers who want a gentle learning curve and a single subscription for everything. SEOLint goes the other way: developer-first, terminal-friendly, with an MCP server and a REST API from day one.

Side-by-side comparison

The features that matter when you are picking a tool for developer-led SEO.

Feature
SEOLint
Sitechecker
Single-page SEO audit
Full site crawl (hundreds of pages)
MCP server for Claude
AI-generated fix prompts
REST API
Backlink analysis
Rank tracking
No install required
Results in under 60 seconds
Free tier available
Starting price
$79/month
$99+/month

Why founders and developers choose us

What you get with SEOLint that Sitechecker does not cover.

  • MCP server: connect to Claude in 2 minutes
  • LLM-ready fix prompt on every issue, paste into Claude or Cursor
  • REST API for GitHub Actions and automation
  • $79/month, focused on developer workflows

Where Sitechecker is different

Honest trade-offs. These are reasons you might still prefer Sitechecker.

  • No MCP server for Claude or other AI tools
  • No AI-generated fix instructions
  • $99+/month for the full suite
  • Not designed for developer CI/CD workflows

Which one should you pick?

Pick Sitechecker if you want a friendly dashboard and do not live in a terminal. Pick SEOLint if you want audit results in JSON, want to wire them into GitHub Actions, and want to ask Claude to fix the issues straight from a chat.

Common questions

Is SEOLint better than Sitechecker?
It depends on your needs. SEOLint is built for founders and developers who use Claude. Connect it as an MCP server in 2 minutes and Claude can scan any URL natively. Every issue comes with a LLM-ready fix prompt that Claude can execute directly on your codebase. Sitechecker is better if you need a full SEO suite or site-wide crawling. If you want AI-native output and developer ergonomics, SEOLint is the focused choice.
Does SEOLint work as an MCP server for Claude?
Yes. Add one config block to Claude Desktop or Claude Code and Claude gains access to scan_website(), get_scan(), and list_scans() as native tools. You can ask Claude "scan my homepage and fix the critical issues" and it handles the full loop, no browser tab needed. Sitechecker has no MCP integration.
How much does SEOLint cost compared to Sitechecker?
SEOLint is $79/month, one flat price per site under agent watch. Includes weekly auto-scans, 200 AI credits/month bundled in (BYOK to skip the cap), MCP server, CLI, AI fix prompts, REST API, GitHub Actions, and the PR bot. No annual commitment, cancel anytime. Multi-site Custom plan available via email.

Connect to Claude in 2 minutes.

$79/month. MCP server included. Cancel anytime.

Try a free scan